Pakistan must not pay the $6 billion it has been order to pay by a corporate court

Last week it was announced that Pakistan has been ordered to pay $5.9 billion in damages to Tethyan Copper, a joint venture between Chilean mining company Antofagasta and Canadian mining company Barrick Gold, nearly a decade after the government refused the company licences for one of the world’s biggest untapped copper and gold mines.

The award was ordered by the World Bank's 'corporate court', the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes or ICSID. Farooq Tariq, General Secretary of the Pakistan Kissan Rabita Committee (PKRC), a national network of peasant organisations, says Pakistan should refuse to pay.

Do not pay the unfair fine; oppose the unjust decision of ICSID

This is a story of a dodgy deal by a multinational company which is earning a massive amount of money through the so-called process of Settlement of Investment Disputes, a World Bank institution acting against developing countries. 

This is a new form of exploitation of the under-developed countries by these foreign investors where corruption is a way of life and lobbying to force the government to sign unjust contracts through retired military officers is done as routine. And if you dare to cancel these dodgy deals, then the World Bank comes to rescue you through its various institutions. 

Here are some details of this unprecedented fine imposed on Pakistan. 

The World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) has imposed a penalty of $5.976 billion on Pakistan - one of the biggest in its history - for the “unlawful denial of a mining lease” to a company in 2011.

The Tethyan Copper Company (TCC) - a joint venture between Chilean mining company Antofagasta and Canada's Barrick Gold Corporation - had filed claims for international arbitration in 2012 after the Balochistan government rejected a leasing request from the company for the Reko Diq project. It had claimed $11.43 billion in damages.

The Chagai Hills Exploration Joint Venture Agreement (Chejva) was signed between the Balochistan Development Authority (BDA) and BHP Minerals, incorporated in Delaware, United States.

The agreement stated that BHP and BDA would form a joint venture for prospecting and exploring gold and copper in Reko Diq. The joint venture was to “apply for up to ten” prospecting licences “covering an area of up to fifty square kilometres in the aggregate” with the provision that it could relinquish the whole or part of this area and apply for licences “over other areas”.

In another major provision of the agreement, BHP and BDA were to make a respective contribution of 75 per cent and 25 per cent of the money required for the project; they would share the revenues also by the same proportion.

However, the agreement was changed again and again in favour of the company after it was signed.

Finally, TCC proposed that only two percent of the total revenue would be given to the Balochistan government and the rest is for them. 

The Supreme Court of Pakistan had in January 2013 declared the Reko Diq agreement void and in conflict with the country's laws.

The government of Balochistan had in 2011 refused to grant a mining licence to TCC for the Reko Diq gold-cum-copper project.

The Balochistan government alleged that the company had not mentioned anything in its report about the processing of gold and copper, which was the main concern of the Balochistan government.

We demand from the Pakistani government not to pay this unfair fine. Pakistan must use all its sources to launch a campaign against this decision nationally and internationally. This unfair and unjust decision must be opposed on all platforms. 


Stop Corporate Courts


Photo: ptmoney.com

Blog

Trump in your trolley: how big business is pushing for lower standards through a trade deal with the US


23 January 2020

Big business wants to use a US-UK trade deal as a way to get deregulation that they have long been pushing for. Transnational corporations try to justify this by saying it would be easier for them to produce to one set of standards, but somehow it is always the lowest common denominator that they push for, not a raising of standards across the board.

We are nearing a climate ‘point of no return’ – climate activists are not terrorists!

Many know by now that another two-weeks long United Nations negotiation on climate change ended with the world’s richest countries and biggest emitters of greenhouse gasses blocking agreements on mitigation, adaptation and recovery.

Resisting Empire 2.0: why we're protesting the UK-Africa Investment Summit


16 January 2020
Aid

For many, the idea of encouraging more foreign investment in African countries make sense. This is certainly the government's hope as they approach the first UK-Africa Investment Summit, to be held in central London on Monday 20 January.