A Trump trade deal could multiply the threat from 'corporate courts'

The US has insisted on the most extreme version of corporate courts in US trade talks – just like in TTIP, the EU-US trade deal we stopped in 2016.

The leaked trade documents from secret meetings between the US and UK reveal that US corporations could get massive new powers to secretly sue the British government in ‘corporate courts.’ Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), or corporate courts, allow foreign corporations to sue governments in secret courts outside of the national legal system.

Governments the world over have been challenged by big business on policies such as health warnings on cigarette packages, introducing a fracking moratorium, sugary drinks tax and environmental concerns on mining. There is currently a case being threatened over the plans of the Dutch government to phase out fossil fuels in response to the climate crisis.

If big business win their cases, governments are forced to cough up millions (sometimes billions) of taxpayers’ money in compensation. Often the threat of a case alone can cause a government to retreat from policies that protect the public and the environment  in fear of being sued in corporate courts.

The leaked trade papers reveal that the US would like to include corporate courts in a US-UK trade deal. It also shows they like the 'chilling effect' that the threat of a case can have on a government considering policies that support the public interest:

"There is value in including ISDS in an investment chapter. The causality is not provable, but even if disputes do not proceed to claims, the presence of a backstop is invaluable in resolving things – including the possibility of Posts reminding a host state of their obligations." [1]

And the US goes even further by rejecting even moderate reforms of the corporate court system proposed by the EU (known as the Multilateral Investment Court, MIC) which would include more transparency into the process and guarantee the right for governments to appeal. US negotiators say that: "adopting such an approach in a future UK-US FTA is ‘untenable with US preferences'" [2] in other words, the US is pushing the UK to adopt the most extreme version of corporate courts.

This is emphasised further by the US, that anything less than the most extreme, pro-business  version of corporate courts would be a "high level concern’ for USTR [US Trade Representative] and Ambassador Lighthizer personally" [3]. And that if the UK were to support the reformed version in a UN forum, the trade deal might be off:

"The US continued to have severe concerns with respect to the EU’s proposals for a Multilateral Investment Court (MIC) and reiterated previous statements that the US Government would be very concerned at any indication that the UK was in favour of a MIC, they were clear that this would undermine the ability of the US to work with the UK in other forums including in the context of the FTA." [4]

The inclusion of corporate courts in a US trade deal would threaten the ability of future UK governments to legislate and make policy decisions in the interests of the public and the environment. It would have far-reaching implications on our ability to tackle the climate emergency or to prevent the NHS from being further privatised. Ultimately, the system of corporate courts is a giant transfer of power into the hands of big business. The US government has clearly set out that they see the inclusion of the most extreme version of corporate courts as a deal breaker.

We need to expose this agenda and say no to this toxic trade deal.



[1] p98 https://issuu.com/wdmuk/docs/4_official_20sensitive_20fourth_20uk-us_20trade_20/1?ff

[2] p30 https://issuu.com/wdmuk/docs/5_official_20sensitive_20fifth_20uk-us_20trade_20a/1?ff

[3] p30 https://issuu.com/wdmuk/docs/5_official_20sensitive_20fifth_20uk-us_20trade_20a/1?ff

[4] p35 https://issuu.com/wdmuk/docs/5_official_20sensitive_20fifth_20uk-us_20trade_20a/1?ff


Is the UK trying to delay its pledge to dump dirty development?

The UK government has just launched a new consultation on how to stop funding fossil fuel projects in the global south. We need your help to send them a clear message: dump dirty development immediately, and dump it for good.

The ‘Post-Trump Systemic Disorder’ we will continue to live in

Hundreds of millions of viewers yesterday watched the live coverage of Air Force One, which took Donald Trump on his last flight as US president from the Joint Base Andrews military facility in Maryland to his massive Mar-a-Lago estate, his post-presidential permanent home in Florida.

The government’s trade agenda threatens disastrous deregulation – but we can stop it

15 January 2021

The Brexit trade deal with the EU might be completed, but the type of country Britain becomes next is still to be defined - and trade rules will play a key role in shaping our future. That’s why we need to keep campaigning on trade in the months and years ahead.